Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
When a patient is suspected of having pulmonary embolism (PE), the first procedure performed in most institutions is lung scintigraphy. Here we propose an alternative diagnostic strategy based on the following sequential combination of procedures: clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, ultrasonography of lower limbs, and lung scan. This integrated approach may rule out PE in the majority of outpatients suspected of PE and permits district hospitals without lung-scan facilities to manage approximately 50% of outpatients without referral. D-dimer alone will exclude PE in about 30% of patients at low cost. This stepwise strategy is especially useful because only 20-35% of patients suspected of PE really have the disease. Thus, in the majority of patients, ruling out the disease has replaced ruling in the disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-996030 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!