Objectives: Gleason grade from prostate needle biopsy (PNB) specimens is important in guiding therapeutic decision making in patients with localized prostate cancer. Recent data from our institution suggest a significant discordance between Gleason grading from PNB versus the actual pathologic grade at radical prostatectomy (RRP). Of most concern is that a substantial proportion of patients with Gleason score of 6 or less from PNB actually have Gleason score of 7 or more at RRP. Under classic measurement theory, one useful way to improve the reliability of an inherently unreliable test is to repeat it. We investigated this strategy in an effort to reduce undergrading errors.
Methods: The control group of patients (n = 51) from our neoadjuvant androgen deprivation protocol was used as the test (two-biopsy) group in this study. These patients underwent two separate PNBs before RRP. We used the highest Gleason score from the two biopsies in these patients and compared the error rates with a concurrent group of patients treated at our institution (n = 226) who had only one set (single-biopsy group) of prostate biopsies. All pathologic slides were reviewed at our institution. Any PNB grade of 6 or less that was scored as 7 or more on final pathology was considered significant.
Results: Mean age, prostate-specific antigen levels, and stage distribution were not significantly different between these two groups. In the single-biopsy group, 165 patients had PNB Gleason score of 6 or less. Of these patients, 63 (38%) had final pathologic grade of 7 or more. In the two-biopsy group, 37 patients had PNB Gleason score of 6 or less. Of these patients, only 7 (19%) had final pathologic grade of 7 or more (P = 0.04).
Conclusions: Prostate rebiopsy minimizes the inherent unreliability of PNB derived grade and should be considered for patients in whom watchful waiting or nomogram-based therapy has been selected.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00226-x | DOI Listing |
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
January 2025
D1 S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia.
Objectives: To study the predictive role of tumor-associated neutrophils in early luminal HER2-negative breast cancer.
Materials And Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on 60 women cases aged from 31 to 79 years underwent surgery for luminal HER2-negative ductal breast cancer in tertiary care cancer centre. We first estimated basic morphological signs: tumor size, tumor grade (by Nottingham Histologic Score), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), Lymphovascular invasion, hormonal receptors status, proliferative index, and regional lymph nodes metastasis.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
January 2025
Department of Pathology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Thailand.
Objective: To determine the correlation among five different types of tumor regression grading (TRG) systems. Test-retest reliability analyses were conducted at two time points to assess the internal validity and consistency of these five TRG systems.
Methods: A test-retest study was performed in 34 pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma specimens.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
January 2025
Postgraduate Program in Oncology, Haroldo Juaçaba Hospital, Ceará Cancer Institute (ICC), Brazil.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the influence of p16 immunohistochemical expression on the biochemical recurrence rate of pT2-pT3 prostate cancer.
Materials And Methods: A total of 488 pT2-pT3 stage prostate adenocarcinomas undergoing radical prostatectomy were included in this study. Following a review of Gleason classification and retrieval of sociodemographic and clinicopathological data, as well as the date of last consultation and biochemical recurrence, immunohistochemistry for p16 was performed.
Int Urol Nephrol
January 2025
Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim (UMM), University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Purpose: To identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and develop a prognostic score in patients receiving docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel at a German tertiary center between March 2010 and November 2023. Prognostic clinical and laboratory factors were analyzed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression.
J Urol
January 2025
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Purpose: Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) prior to biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa.
Materials And Methods: Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences prior to prostate biopsy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!