Adduction arytenopexy: a new procedure for paralytic dysphonia with implications for implant medialization.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl

Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Published: September 1998

AI Article Synopsis

  • Arytenoid adduction is a surgical procedure aimed at improving voice function in patients with paralytic dysphonia but can sometimes lead to excessive rotation of the vocal process.
  • A new technique called adduction arytenopexy was developed to better position the arytenoid for sound production by using a special suture for fixation on the cricoid facet.
  • Studies showed that adduction arytenopexy significantly increased the length of the vocal fold and improved its contour while demonstrating high success rates and low complication rates in clinical trials.

Article Abstract

Arytenoid adduction was designed to enhance posterior glottal closure in patients with paralytic dysphonia by reproducing lateral cricoarytenoid muscle function. However this procedure can exaggerate normal medial rotation of the vocal process, because the agonist-antagonist function of the interarytenoid, lateral thyroarytenoid, and posterior cricoarytenoid muscles is not simulated. Therefore, a new adduction procedure (adduction arytenopexy) was devised to affix the arytenoid on the cricoid facet in a more optimal position for glottal sound production. The adduction arytenopexy procedure was designed on fresh cadavers. In this technique, the lateral aspect of the cricoarytenoid joint is opened widely and the body of the arytenoid is manually medialized along the cricoid facet. A specially designed single suture is then placed through the posterior cricoid and the body or the muscular process of the arytenoid to achieve 2-point fixation. This draws the arytenoid posteriorly, superiorly, and medially for precise positioning. The arytenoid is rocked internally on the cricoid facet, and suture tension is adjusted appropriately to simulate normal cricoarytenoid adduction. In the first study, the adduction arytenopexy was compared with the classic arytenoid adduction in 10 fresh cadaver larynges. The new arytenopexy procedure resulted in an average increase of 2.1 mm (p < .01) in the length of the musculomembranous vocal fold, whereas the classic arytenoid adduction did not reveal a significant change in length. Additionally, the adduction arytenopexy resulted in a consistently higher vocal fold and a more normally contoured arytenoid than the classic adduction procedure. The second study consisted of a clinical trial in which 12 patients, who presented with a widely patent posterior glottis, underwent adduction arytenopexy in conjunction with implant medialization. The procedure was successful in all patients, and there were minimal complications. In the third study, preoperative and postoperative vocal assessment measures (stroboscopic, aerodynamic, acoustic, and perceptual) were analyzed in 9 of the 12 patients. The most striking preoperative stroboscopic observation was that 8 of the 9 patients presented with an aperiodic vibrational flutter during phonation due to severe valvular incompetence. Postoperatively, all patients developed complete closure of the glottal chink and effective entrained oscillation of the vocal folds. This visual improvement in function was commensurate with comparable changes in most of the other objective and subjective measures of vocal function. The new adduction arytenopexy procedure closely simulates the biomechanics underlying normal glottal closure and cricoarytenoid adduction. In turn, complex implant design shapes are not necessary to achieve proper alignment of the arytenoid and the vocal fold. Because the arytenoid is properly positioned prior to the medialization, implants can be sized more precisely and are unencumbered by an anterior thyroid lamina suture. These procedural innovations resulted in enhanced entrained oscillation of the glottal valve and, in turn, improved laryngeal sound production.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adduction arytenopexy
28
arytenopexy procedure
16
adduction
14
arytenoid adduction
12
cricoid facet
12
vocal fold
12
arytenoid
11
procedure
8
paralytic dysphonia
8
implant medialization
8

Similar Publications

Complications and Revisions for Adduction Arytenopexy, Medialization Laryngoplasty, and Cricothyroid Subluxation over 19 Years.

J Voice

September 2024

Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Otolaryngology, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address:

Objective: To report the long-term data of the Triple procedure (medialization laryngoplasty, adduction arytenopexy, and cricothyroid subluxation) regarding complications and revisions in a large cohort of patients.

Study Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent ≥1 components of the Triple procedure between January 2000 and July 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: For unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) with large posterior glottic gap medialization laryngoplasty (ML) + arytenoid adduction (AA), ML + adduction arytenopexy (AApexy), and ML alone using prosthesis with posterior extension are possible solutions. This study was carried out to elucidate the controversy among these solution options.

Methods: Retrospective cohort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Addressing the Arytenoid in Paralytic Dysphonia Using the Adduction Arytenopexy.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol

October 2021

Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Voice and Speech Laboratory, Division of Laryngology, Mass Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,

Adduction arytenopexy is a surgical procedure that allows the surgeon to position the arytenoid cartilage in a vocally favorable position with a suture. It is not needed in most cases of vocal paralysis when there is favorable synkinesis and good positioning of the arytenoid body. When there is a large posterior gap (intercartilaginous region), height discrepancy, or an anteriorly displaced arytenoid, adduction arytenopexy is used to suture the arytenoid cartilage into the posterior and medial aspect of the cricoarytenoid joint facet, bringing the medial bodies of the arytenoid cartilages together allowing increased closure resulting in higher dynamic range in postoperative voices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Type I thyroplasty: A safe outpatient procedure.

Laryngoscope

July 2019

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A.

Objectives/hypothesis: Overnight hospitalization is routinely advocated following type I thyroplasty (TP) because of concerns for airway compromise. Hospitalization increases cost and patient inconvenience, and may not necessarily be appropriate. This study evaluated complications following surgery and identified predictors for same to assess which patients benefit most from hospitalization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surgical histoanatomy for adduction arytenopexy using injection laryngoplasty.

J Laryngol Otol

December 2018

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Japan.

Background: In order to improve a large posterior glottal gap and/or aspiration, injections of augmentation substances should not only be administered at the mid-membranous vocal fold in the thyroarytenoid muscle, but also at the cartilaginous portion of the vocal fold to make adduction arytenopexy possible.

Method: Ten adult human larynges were investigated using the whole-organ serial section technique.

Results: Vertical thickness of the posterior aspect of the thyroarytenoid muscle was relatively thin (3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!