[Polyethylene wear of the Optifix cementless acetabular component after 5 years].

Ann Chir

Service d'Orthopédie, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Published: September 1998

The aim of this study is to review our experience with the Optifix porous-coated cementless acetabular component at an average 5 year follow-up. In a retrospective clinical investigation, the amount and rate of linear wear of the polyethylene of 26 cementless Optifix acetabular components implanted during a primary Hybrid (Spectron femoral component) total hip replacement in 24 patients, were determined by a comparison of the thicknesses of the cup as measured on the initial and most recent follow-up radiographs. The measurements were corrected for magnification error by direct measurement of the diameter of the femoral head on each radiograph according to the technique of Livermore et al. The mean duration of follow-up was 60 months (range, 48 to 73 months). Linear wear averaged 0.53 +/- 0.12 mm (0 to 2.28 mm) overall, with a mean rate of 0.11 +/- 0.02 mm (range 0 to 0.46 mm) per year p < 0.005. No osteolysis of the acetabulum was seen. None of the acetabular components migrated. Osteolysis of the endosteum of the femur was found in six hips. None of the femoral components subsided. In conclusion, wear of the polyethylene in this cup has not been previously reported, and is consistent with results published with other types of acetabular components.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acetabular components
12
cementless acetabular
8
acetabular component
8
linear wear
8
wear polyethylene
8
acetabular
5
[polyethylene wear
4
wear optifix
4
optifix cementless
4
component years]
4

Similar Publications

Several studies suggested that total hip arthroplasty (THA) was more technical demanding following previous pelvic osteotomy (PO), resulting in poor outcomes compared with primary THA. However, the other studies regarding this topic had reported contradictory results. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the clinical results and other parameters between total hip arthroplasty following pelvic osteotomy and primary total hip arthroplasty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Large-diameter heads (LDHs) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) enhance range of motion but require thinner liners. Monoblock acetabular components with ceramic liners could reduce liner fracture risks during modular acetabular component assembly. This study aims to confirm the safety and clinical performance of the monoblock Maxera Cup in THA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The ideal anteversion at which the acetabular and femoral components for a total hip arthroplasty (THA) should be implanted is still a subject of debate. One alignment philosophy being explored is restoration of individual constitutional femoral and acetabular anteversion. This study aimed to measure combined anteversion in a healthy hip population and understand the expected phenotypes and ranges for constitutional hip alignment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely used for active, elderly patients with femoral neck fractures (FNF). Compared to THA for osteoarthritis, THA for FNF is associated with a higher incidence of dislocation and reoperation. Robotic assistance may improve component positioning and leg-length restoration in THA, but its use in FNF has not been described.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Accurate acetabular component positioning is crucial for the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malplacement of the acetabular component increases the risk of post-surgery complications, most notably dislocation.1 Furthermore, malposition can also result in wear of the polyethylene liner, limited range of motion, and osteolysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!