Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A comparison of two techniques for measuring cardiac output, thermodilution (TD) and thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB), was undertaken in a porcine model. Eight anaesthetized large white pigs were studied. A total of 436 paired measurements were performed over a range of cardiac outputs from 1.7 to 15.1 l/min as measured by thermodilution. The Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was r = 0.963 with P < 0.001. Analysis by Bland and Altman statistics revealed a mean difference (bias) of -0.02 l/min and the limits of agreement were +/- 1.6 l/min, similar to figures found in human comparative studies. These results confirm that thoracic electrical bioimpedance is a valid method of measuring cardiac output in pigs. It has significant advantages compared to thermodilution, in particular it is cheap, simple to use, non-invasive and provides continuous data.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/002367798780559266 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!