Background And Study Aims: Anastomotic leakage is a severe complication in gastric surgery and it is associated with a high rate of mortality. Conservative treatment sometimes is not sufficient to stem the leakages and, even when it is sufficient, it takes a long time. The present study describes the first experience in the treatment of anastomotic leakages with endoscopic clipping.

Patients And Methods: From May 1995 to December 1996, seven patients with postoperative anastomotic leakages after gastric surgery were prospectively treated in our Endoscopy Service. Metallic endoclips (MD 850, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with prongs 12 mm long and 6 mm wide were applied, controlling the closure of the leakage by endoscopy, using radiographs to confirm the closure 24 hours later.

Results: Complete closure of the leakage was obtained in all seven cases. A single session of endoscopic clipping was needed for five patients while two other required, respectively, two and three sessions. The median time of leakage closure after endoscopic clipping was 2.3 days (range 1-5 days). The clips spontaneously dislodged within 1 month in five patients and within the second month in the other two patients.

Conclusion: Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic leakages by metallic clips represents a safe and easily repeated method and, compared to conservative treatment, it seems to offer several time and cost advantages. Further studies involving a larger number of patients are needed to verify this finding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1001307DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anastomotic leakages
16
endoscopic clipping
12
gastric surgery
8
conservative treatment
8
treatment anastomotic
8
closure leakage
8
endoscopic
5
anastomotic
5
leakages
5
clipping anastomotic
4

Similar Publications

Background: Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to identify the prevalence of anastomotic leak, stratified by operative approach and disease etiology, as well as risk factors for leak.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis using the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database was conducted on patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction between 2009-2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Outcomes of Colectomy for Nonmalignant Polyps and Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

J Surg Res

January 2025

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address:

Introduction: In the United States, while most nonmalignant polyps are effectively treated through endoscopic removal, colectomy remains a treatment option for selected cases of nonmalignant polyps (NMPs) and colon cancer. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes for colectomies in these two conditions, hypothesizing similar complication rates.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2015 to 2021, including patients who underwent elective colectomies for colon cancer or NMPs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endoscopic Management of Benign Pancreaticobiliary Disorders.

J Clin Med

January 2025

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason, Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.

Endoscopic management of benign pancreaticobiliary disorders encompasses a range of procedures designed to address complications in gallstone disease, choledocholithiasis, and pancreatic disorders. Acute cholecystitis is typically treated with cholecystectomy or percutaneous drainage (PT-GBD), but for high-risk or future surgical candidates, alternative decompression methods, such as endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETP-GBD), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), are effective. PT-GBD is associated with significant discomfort as well as variable adverse event rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Unplanned, delayed readmissions (>30 ds) following oncologic surgeries can increase mortality and care costs and affect hospital quality indices. However, there is a dearth of literature on rectal cancer surgery. Hence, we aimed to assess the risk factors associated with delayed readmissions following rectal cancer surgery to improve targeted interventions, patient outcomes, and quality indices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!