Biological profile of in situ breast cancer investigated by immunohistochemical technique.

Cancer Detect Prev

Department of Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, Ferrara University, Italy.

Published: September 1998

In 74 in situ breast cancers an immunohistochemical study for estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, proliferation index (PI), and c-erbB-2, p53, and bcl-2 overexpression was performed. Cases were categorized as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) comedo: 24.3% of cases; DCIS non comedo: 27% of cases; DCIS cribriform: 5.4% of cases; lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS): 16.3% of cases; mixed carcinoma in situ: 27% of cases. Quantitation of immunohistochemical results was obtained with an image analysis computerized system (CAS 200). The cutoff values used were: 10% of positive area for ER, PR, NEU, and bcl-2; 5% of positive area for p53; 13% of PI for proliferative activity. DCIS cribriform and LCIS displayed a higher positivity for ER (92.6 and 93.8% of cases); DCIS cribriform and DCIS non comedo a higher for PR (89 and 75.3%); DCIS comedo presented the highest values for PI (65.4%), NEU (72.8%), and p53 expression (37.3%). All DCIS cribriform and DCIS non comedo and 99.6% of LCIS expressed bcl-2. The results underscore the importance of biological characterization of breast carcinoma in situ with the aim to define lesions natural history.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1500.1998.cdoa41.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dcis comedo
20
carcinoma situ
16
dcis cribriform
16
cases dcis
12
dcis
9
situ breast
8
27% cases
8
positive area
8
cribriform dcis
8
cases
7

Similar Publications

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) represents 1% of all breast cancer cases and is arguably a more aggressive subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Preoperative evaluation of DCISM usually relies on core needle biopsy, and non-invasive evaluation methods are relatively limited. This study aims to explore the features of conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in DCISM and to analyze the US and clinicopathological predictors of infiltrating components.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Molecular characteristics of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are linked to risks of early relapse, prompting a study to explore their correlations through histopathological and biomarker analysis.
  • The study analyzed 100 DCIS cases, assessing features such as tumor location, type, and grade, while performing immunohistochemical staining for various receptors and the Ki-67 labeling index to determine molecular subtypes.
  • Results indicated most DCIS cases were positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors, with significant correlations found between histopathological characteristics and receptor status, highlighting the potential implications for treatment and prognosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the predictive capabilities of preoperative mammography, dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in determining hormone receptor (HRc) status for pure ductal carcinoma (DCIS) lesions.

Materials And Methods: The study included a total of 79 patients who underwent preoperative mammography (MG) and MRI between December 2018 and December 2023 and were subsequently diagnosed with pure DCIS after surgery. The correlation between MG, DCE-MRI, and DWI features and estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status was examined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Malignant phyllodes, along with ductal carcinoma, is known as metaplastic cancer of the breast. This tumor is additionally known as breast carcinosarcoma. Malignant phyllodes in conjunction with ductal carcinoma is a rare finding in routine clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rationale And Objectives: The prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is more similar to that of small invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) than to pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). It is particularly important to accurately distinguish between DCISM and DCIS. The present study aims to compare the clinical and imaging characteristics of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between DCISM and pure DCIS, and to identify predictive factors of microinvasive carcinoma, which may contribute to a comprehensive understanding of DCISM in clinical diagnosis and support surveillance strategies, such as surgery, radiation, and other treatment decisions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!