A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

p53 sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome of patients with esophageal carcinoma. | LitMetric

Background: The ability to predict biologic behavior and treatment responsiveness would be a valuable asset in the multimodality approach to esophageal carcinoma. The authors examined whether alterations of the p53 gene correlate with clinicopathologic parameters, response to preoperative chemotherapy/radiotherapy, and outcome in patients with esophageal carcinoma. METHODS. Histopathologic/genetic analysis of p53 was performed on formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues. Tissue sections were stained immunohistochemically for p53 protein followed by topographic genotyping comprised of polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing of p53 exons 5-8. All patients received induction chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and alpha-interferon) and concurrent external beam radiotherapy (4500 centigrays) followed by resection.

Results: p53 analysis performed on 42 tumors from patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma revealed 25 of the 42 tumors (59.5%) to be p53 immunopositive; however, only 17 of the 42 tumors (40.5%) were proven to contain p53 point mutational damage in exons 8 (n=5), 5 (n=5), 7 (n=4), and 6 (n=3). Eight cases were weakly immunopositive and had no genotype mutation suggesting hyperexpression of normal wild-type p53. Genotyping also identified two immunonegative cases with deletion-type mutations (exons 5 and 6). Tissue samples collected before and after chemotherapy/radiotherapy exhibited fidelity in p53 mutational genotype in all cases. The presence of a p53 point mutation positively correlated with pTNM stage (P=0.003) and residual disease in the resected specimen (P=0.01). Moreover, survival of patients with p53 mutations was significantly lower than that of patients without mutations (overall survival of 21.6 months vs. 40 months; P=0.0038; and disease free survival of 14.1 months vs. 38 months; P=0.0004).

Conclusions: Histopathologic/genetic analysis is a better determinant of p53 mutational damage than immunohistochemistry alone and can be used as a prognostic marker for esophageal carcinoma. p53 genotyping may define a subset of patients who respond to chemotherapy/radiotherapy and may predict who potentially benefits from multimodality therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esophageal carcinoma
20
p53
14
outcome patients
8
patients esophageal
8
histopathologic/genetic analysis
8
p53 point
8
mutational damage
8
p53 genotyping
8
p53 mutational
8
months months
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!