Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: The aim of the present study is to demonstrate further reconstruction of a double-gracilis anorectal neosphincter that had been destroyed because of a severe postoperative perineal infection, with necrosis of the distal part of the muscles.
Method: Each residual gracilis muscle was split longitudinally into two branches, which surrounded the neorectum, one posteriorly and the other one anteriorly, so as to perform a perineorectal double sling.
Result: Owing to a poor functional result, continence was achieved only by the support of an implantable pulse generator.
Conclusion: This technique seemed to permit the optimum use of the contractile potential of the residual gracilis muscles, which did not show evidence of defunction-related or ischemia-related fibrosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02236271 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!