Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The present study was conducted in order to describe human hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis adaptation in a model of repeated physical stress (endurance training) that causes a moderate increase in cortisol levels.
Subjects: We performed the same stimulation tests (adrenal stimulation with ACTH or pituitary stimulation with combined CRH/LVP) in a population of 8 endurance-trained athletes in two distinct situations: resting (baseline cortisol values) and 2 h after the end of strenuous exercise (increased cortisol values) to evaluate the HPA axis sensitivity to endogenous sustained increases in cortisol concentrations.
Measurements: During these tests, saliva and plasma cortisol (Fs and Fp, respectively) were assessed and compared.
Result: Cortisol values in both plasma and saliva at the end of 2 h of exercise were significantly higher than in rested controls: Fs 11.5 +/- 1.3 vs 6.5 +/- 0.8 nmol.l-1 and Fp 428 +/- 36 vs 279 +/- 27 nmol.l-1 (post exercise vs post rest sessions, respectively, P < 0.001 for both). After either hormone test (CRH/LVP or ACTH), cortisol levels in plasma and saliva increased similarly when rest was compared to post exercise. Saliva variations (delta %) under exogenous hormone stimulation were dramatically greater than plasma variations. For example, under ACTH stimulation, the relative increments in cortisol were on control day: delta Fs 980 +/- 139 vs delta Fp 218 +/- 43% (saliva vs plasma, respectively, P < 0.05) and on exercise day: delta Fs 605 +/- 89 vs delta Fp 102 +/- 14% (saliva vs plasma, respectively, P < 0.05).
Conclusions: In endurance-trained athletes, displaying a moderate but sustained endogenous cortisol increase: (1) ACTH responses following pituitary stimulation are not blunted, (2) cortisol responses following maximal adrenal stimulation are not blunted. Our results favour the hypothesis of a decreased pituitary sensitivity to cortisol negative feedback whereas the hypothesis of a major decreased adrenal sensitivity to ACTH was discarded. The greater ability of saliva assays to detect a cortisol increase strongly supports its use in the study of HPA physiology, whether under basal or dynamic conditions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00334.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!