Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Muscarinic cholinergic pathways have been implicated in the visual control of ocular growth. However, the source(s) of acetylcholine and the tissue(s) which regulate ocular growth via muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) remain unknown. We sought to determine whether retinal sources of acetylcholine and mAChRs contribute to visually guided ocular growth in the chick. Cholinergic amacrine cells were ablated by intraocular injections of either ethylcholine mustard aziridinium ion (ECMA; a selective cholinotoxin) or quisqualic acid (QA; an excitotoxin that destroys many amacrine cells, including those that release acetylcholine). Disruption of cholinergic pathways was assessed immunocytochemically with antibodies to the acetylcholine-synthesizing enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and three different isoforms of mAChR, and by biochemical assay for ChAT activity. ECMA (25 nmol) destroyed two of the four subtypes of cholinergic amacrine cells and attenuated retinal ChAT activity, but left retinal mAChR-immunoreactivity intact. QA (200 nmol) destroyed the majority of all four subtypes of cholinergic amacrine cells, and ablated most mAChR-immunoreactivity and ChAT activity in the retina. ECMA and QA had no apparent effect on mAChRs or cholinergic fibres in the choroid, only marginally reduced choroidal ChAT activity, and had little effect on ChAT activity in the anterior segment. Toxin-treated eyes remained emmetropic and responded to form-deprivation by growing excessively and becoming myopic. Furthermore, daily intravitreal injection of 40 microg atropine for 6 days into form-deprived toxin-treated eyes completely prevented ocular elongation and myopia. We conclude that neither cholinergic amacrine cells nor mAChRs in the retina are required for visual regulation of ocular growth, and that atropine may exert its growth-suppressing influence by acting upon extraretinal mAChRs, possibly in the choroid, retinal pigmented epithelium, or sclera.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00188-7 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!