Background: Several recent studies have added significant information regarding the benefit of screening mammography, especially in the 40-49-years age group. This new information makes it important to reassess the cost-effectiveness of screening.
Methods: A Markov model was used to study the cost-effectiveness of 4 age-related screening strategies: 1) annually from ages 40-79 years; 2) annually from ages 40-64 years and biennially from ages 65-79 years; 3) annually from ages 40-49 years and biennially from ages 50-79 years; and 4) annually from ages 40-79 years in high risk women (10%) and biennially from ages 40-49 years followed by annually from ages 50 -79 years in normal risk women (90%). An additional strategy simulating hormone status and estrogen exposure was evaluated. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as marginal cost per year-life saved (MCYLS).
Results: The MCYLS varied from $18,800 to $16,100. For all strategies this was within the range of other generally acceptable diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures. There was a 14% decrease in MCYLS from the least cost-effective to the most cost-effective strategy.
Conclusions: Cost-effectiveness of four age-related mammographic screening strategies was evaluated. The MCYLS for all strategies was within a generally accepted range. With increasing concerns regarding the cost of health care, this information may be useful in health policy decision-making.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2235::aid-cncr19>3.0.co;2-v | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!