Objective: To our report our experience with the laparoscopic placement of peritoneal access ports and to compare it to our experience with placement at laparotomy.

Methods: Patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in a study to receive intraperitoneal paclitaxel in combination with intravenous cisplatin and cyclophosphamide as first- or second-line chemotherapy. Patients had a PAP catheter placed at primary laparotomy or by a separate laparoscopic procedure under general anesthesia.

Results: In 13 patients a PAP catheter was placed during primary laparotomy, without complications. Thirteen patients had laparoscopic catheter placing, using routine Veress needle insufflation. After a bowel perforation at insertion of the umbilical trocar had occurred in one patient, due to extensive adhesions, we decided to use only an open laparoscopic procedure. No other procedure or catheter-related complications occurred.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted placement of PAP catheters is feasible, but should preferably be performed by an open laparoscopic procedure in this patient population at risk for intraabdominal adhesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1998.4968DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic procedure
12
laparoscopic placement
8
placement pap
8
pap catheters
8
ovarian carcinoma
8
patients pap
8
pap catheter
8
catheter primary
8
primary laparotomy
8
open laparoscopic
8

Similar Publications

For patients considering bariatric surgery, it is essential to have clear answers to common questions to ensure the success of the procedure. Patients should understand that surgery is not a quick fix but a tool that must be complemented by lifestyle changes, including dietary adjustments and regular physical activity. The procedure carries potential risks that should be weighed against the potential benefits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: vNOTES has been documented as a viable approach for conducting benign gynecologic surgery; however, its application in ectopic pregnancy cases remains relatively scarce. The principal objective of this investigation was to assess the practicability, effectiveness, and safety of vNOTES in surgical procedures related to ectopic pregnancy.

Methods: Clinical data pertaining to patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy at Beijing Hospital between January 2018 and August 2023 were retrospectively collected (This study retrospectively registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number ChiCTR2100052223 in September 22, 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Acute appendicitis and its treatment: a historical overview.

Int J Colorectal Dis

January 2025

Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy.

Purpose: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the leading cause of acute abdomen worldwide, with an incidence of 90-100 cases per 100,000 individuals annually and a lifetime risk of 7-12%. Despite its prevalence, historical accounts of AA are limited, particularly when compared to conditions like haemorrhoids, likely due to the appendix's internal location. This article traces the historical evolution of AA treatment from ancient times to the present, highlighting key contributions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second leading cause of healthcare-associated infections in Europe with the highest rates being reported in colorectal surgery (ranging from 9% to 30%). Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the most efficient measures for SSI prevention and should be started before surgical incision. Cefoxitin is an antibiotic widely used as SAP for colorectal surgery, but its continuous administration is currently the subject of debate due to its potential pharmacokinetic advantages.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The costs related to robotic surgery are known to be greater than those associated with laparoscopy. However, the potential for better outcomes of the former could lead to a cost-effectiveness advantage. The aim of this study is therefore to highlight the difference in cost-effectiveness between robotic and laparoscopic rectal resection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!