The Analytab Products Inc. (API), Micro-Drop (MD), and Uni-Yeast-Tek (UYT) systems for the presumptive identification of common clinical yeast isolates were compared with the oxidation-fermentation (OF) and a conventional procedure. With 229 coded isolates, the identification accuracies were API 94, MD 83, OF 82, and UYT 99%. The API system required the greatest technical ability. The MD materials were prone to malfunction. OF media, if incubated beyond 14 days, gave an accuracy of 87%, but this offered no advantage over the conventional procedure. The UYT system was the easiest to use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC274388PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.4.1.49-53.1976DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical yeast
8
yeast isolates
8
conventional procedure
8
evaluation commercial
4
commercial systems
4
systems identification
4
identification clinical
4
isolates analytab
4
analytab products
4
products api
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!