Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The relative bioavailability of theophylline (CAS 58-55-9) was evaluated after a single dose administration of two sustained-release theophylline tablet formulations: Controfilina-200 as test preparation (test) and a commonly used reference preparation (reference). The design of the study was crossover in twelve healthy volunteers, with a series of two experimental sessions. The two sessions were carried out at weekly intervals. Theophylline concentrations were measured by HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography). The bioavailability was compared using the parameters: AUC0-infinity (area under the concentration-time curve), Cmax (maximal theophylline concentration), tmax (time after drug intake at which the maximal concentration is reached) and Cmax/AUC0-infinity. The results of this study indicated that the new generic sustained-release tablet and the reference are bioequivalent when the same dosage is administered.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!