Study Design: An animal study was conducted to assess whether different surgical procedures of spinal fixation and destabilization would influence the biomechanics and histology of lumbar spinal ligaments.

Objectives: To investigate the effects of spinal fixation and destabilization as well as surgical intervention itself on the biomechanical and histologic properties of lumbar spinal ligaments.

Summary Of Background Data: Although several investigators have reported normal biomechanical properties of different spinal ligaments, there have been no studies in which changes in spinal ligament properties, secondary to the altered biomechanical environment provided by such surgical procedures as spinal fixation and destabilization, have been investigated.

Methods: Thirty-six mature sheep were divided into four groups: Group I: nonsurgical control: Group II: sham operation consisting of bilateral posterolateral exposure at L4-L5; Group III: spinal fixation using transpedicular screws and plates and bilateral posterolateral bone graft at L4-L5; and Group IV: spinal destabilization consisting of bilateral facetectomy and anterior discectomy at L4-L5. Four months after surgery, the biomechanical analysis included destructive tensile testing of four different bone-ligament-bone complexes at the operative and proximal adjacent levels: anterior longitudinal ligament, posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum, and supraspinous and interspinous ligaments combined. Histomorphometric analyses of the vertebral body and spinal ligaments were performed histomorphometrically.

Results: Biomechanical analysis results demonstrated remarkable changes in the structural and mechanical ligament properties at the operative level. The fixation group's ligaments showed consistent decreases in the ultimate load and elastic modulus compared with those parameters in the control group (P < 0.05). Histologically, the fixation group's ligamentum flavum showed marked vacuolation in the ligament substance, whereas the interspinous ligament exhibited significant insertion changes compared with little change in substance. In all eight sheep in Group IV, unintentional bilateral facet fusions were obtained; and in all eight animals in Group III with pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion, solid arthrodesis was exhibited. This allowed a distinction to be made between the stress-shielding effect of spinal instrumentation and arthrodesis (Group III) versus spinal fusion alone (Group IV) on both spinal ligament and vertebral body. Group II (sham) had a significant decrease in supraspinous and interspinous ligaments, but nonsignificant decreases in the stress-shielding effect of 10-12% in other ligaments.

Conclusions: Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion led to decreased biomechanical properties of the ligamentum flavum, posterior longitudinal ligament, and interspinous and supraspinous ligaments. The stress-shielding effects were ligament dependent and were most pronounced on the posterior side. The altered biomechanical environment produced by spinal fixation, surgical intervention itself, or nonphysiologic mobilization can affect the ligamentous properties in vivo, possibly serving as the impetus for low back pain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199803150-00006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal fixation
24
fixation destabilization
16
spinal
16
spinal ligaments
12
group iii
12
longitudinal ligament
12
ligamentum flavum
12
group
10
ligament
9
effects spinal
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Determine if Sacral Alar-Iliac (SAI) screw diameter is associated with pelvic fixation failure in pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) treated with posterior spinal fusion (PSF).

Methods: NMS patients from a single institution who underwent PSF with bilateral SAI screw fixation from 2010 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters, SAI screw sizes, and radiographic outcomes were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To systematically evaluate the differences in the clinical efficacy of lumbar degenerative disorders (LDDs) treatment between oblique lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF), OLIF stand-alone (OLIF-SA), and OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF). A systematic search was conducted on both English and Chinese databases, wherein the literature was screened based on title, abstract, and full text. Literature that met the inclusion criteria was assessed for quality and relevant information was extracted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pedicle Screw Placement in Pediatric and Adolescent Spinal Deformity Surgery: Does Tapping of the Pedicle Screw Tract Increase Safety?

J Pediatr Orthop

January 2025

Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Pediatrics and Adolescent Orthopaedic Surgery and Division of Spine Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Introduction: Since the development of pedicle screw fixation in the spine, safe placement has remained a crucial component in maximizing patient outcomes and mitigating pedicle screw-related complications. The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of pedicle tapping in identifying pedicle breaches.

Methods: A pediatric spine surgery database was queried to identify a consecutive series of patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery utilizing pedicle screw fixation between May 2019 and October 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An investigation of the mechanism of adjacent segment disease in a porcine spine model.

Clin Biomech (Bristol)

January 2025

Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address:

Background: Fusion changes the biomechanics of the spine leading to the potential development of adjacent segment disease. Despite many studies on adjacent segment disease, it is largely unknown how spinal fixation affects the mechanical properties of the adjacent disc. The purpose of this study was to assess whether axial compression causes mechanical disruption to the annulus when the caudal spinal level is immobilized or injured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intervertebral disc regeneration - Is it possible?

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc

December 2024

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Brugmann University Hospital Center, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate disc metabolism after decreasing the axial load through surgery by assessing the glycosaminoglycan content through a non-invasive method-delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC).

Methods: Sixteen patients with mono-segmental disc degeneration (L4-L5 or L5-S1) who underwent posterior lumbar spine fixation with intervertebral distraction of 2 consecutive vertebrae using monoaxial transpedicular screws and lyophilized allograft to achieve segmental fusion, and who had a follow-up period of at least 2 years, were included in this study. The first lumbar disc was used as the control group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!