Objectives: To evaluate the use of a clinical-care pathway that decreased the stay in hospital after radical retropubic prostatectomy from 3 to 2 days, assessing the costs and quality of care.

Patients And Methods: Forty-four consecutive men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy were evaluated prospectively. The first 22 men were hospitalized under the standard 3-day clinical-care pathway in use at our institution. This pathway was evaluated, shortened to construct a 2-day pathway, and a second group of 22 consecutive men hospitalized under the new pathway. Both groups were evaluated and compared 6 weeks post-operatively.

Results: The mean (SD) hospital stay was 2.1 (0.3) days for men in the 2-day and 2.9 (0.4) days for men in the 3-day pathway (P < 0.001). The mean (SD) hospital cost was $8468 (801) in the 2-day and $8806 (630) in the 3-day pathway (P=0.13). None of the men in the 2-day and one of 22 men in the 3-day pathway experienced a major complication (P=0.31). Two of 22 men in the 2-day and one of 22 in the 3-day pathway exceeded the expected stay by one day (P=0.55).

Conclusion: The hospital stay after radical retropubic prostatectomy can be safely shortened from 3 to 2 days for most men. However, the shorter hospital stay does not result in significant cost savings. The shorter stay does not appear to compromise quality of care. Proper patient education and careful pre- and post-operative supervision are necessary for a successful outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00543.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hospital stay
16
3-day pathway
16
clinical-care pathway
12
radical retropubic
12
retropubic prostatectomy
12
days men
12
men 2-day
12
pathway
9
men
9
stay radical
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: Patients are often discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for postacute rehabilitation. Functional outcomes achieved in SNFs are variable, and costs are high. Especially for accountable care organizations (ACOs), home-based postacute rehabilitation offers a high-value option if outcomes are not compromised.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Understanding clinical trajectories of sepsis patients is crucial for prognostication, resource planning, and to inform digital twin models of critical illness. This study aims to identify common clinical trajectories based on dynamic assessment of cardiorespiratory support using a validated electronic health record data that covers retrospective cohort of 19,177 patients with sepsis admitted to ICUs of Mayo Clinic Hospitals over eight-year period. Patient trajectories were modeled from ICU admission up to 14 days using an unsupervised machine learning two-stage clustering method based on cardiorespiratory support in ICU and hospital discharge status.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has recently been used to predict adverse health outcomes including length of stay (LOS) in hospital. LOS is an important indicator for patient quality of care, the measurement of hospital performance, efficiency and costs. Tools to predict LOS may enable earlier interventions in those identified at higher risk of a long stay.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Continuous local infiltration analgesia is equal to femoral and sciatic nerve block for total knee arthroplasty.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

January 2025

Department of Anaesthesia, Main-Kinzig-Kliniken, Herzbachweg 14, 63571, Gelnhausen, Germany.

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Pain control is crucial for rapid mobilisation and reduces side effects as well as the length of hospital stay. In this context, a variety of multimodal pain control regimes show good pain relief, including several nerve blocks, iPACK and local infiltration analgesia (LIA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The effectiveness of rehabilitation aimed at improving the activities of daily living and physical functions may differ between hospitalized patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and not undergoing HD (non-HD). The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of rehabilitation between hospitalized HD and non-HD patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of inpatients who underwent rehabilitation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!