Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jaap.1.1997.25.3.507 | DOI Listing |
Med Humanit
September 2023
EUME, Forum transregionale Studien e V, Berlin, Germany
The theory of psychoanalysis came to Turkey in the early 1900s, but it was dismissed as being unmedical in a psychiatric context shaped by the Kraepelinian model. Still, it rapidly entered the intellectual discourses of the period, and in literature, it became a contact zone to discuss broader issues concerning the modernisation of the country. Novelists in particular undertook a critique of its epistemology to explore what they deemed the conflictual relationship between the native values and the westernising attitudes as broadly conceived at the time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Relat (David Davies Mem Inst Int Stud)
March 2023
Since the beginning of the global Covid-19 pandemic in the spring of 2020 countries across the world have implemented various measures to contain the virus. They have restricted public gatherings, mobility and congregation of people at homes and in public places. These restrictions however did not stop another chain of events - the global Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNervenarzt
January 2022
, Taunusstr. 12, 12161, Berlin, Deutschland.
In textbooks of psychiatry and/or neurology which appeared during the Nazi period, psychoanalysis is mostly treated unkindly, although they avoid antisemitic reasoning. Kurt Kolle accords Freud merely a historical role and favors the comprehensive psychotherapy cultivated from 1936 onwards at the "Göring Institute". There is however a remarkable contribution by Josef Reinhold (Jeseník/Czechoslovakia) showing considerable knowledge and demonstrating to which degree psychoanalysis could be acknowledged under the Nazi regime in an academic text written by a non-German author.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Psychoanal
June 2019
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
This article is an examination of the history of Strachey's work as the editor of the , work that was shaped by the internal strife within British psychoanalysis and the great international conflict of the Second World War. From the primary sources it has been possible to give an account of how he came to be in charge of the , why he was suited to the role, and also to provide an example of what he was like as an editor dealing with colleague-contributors. It is argued that due to his long-held belief in free speech and candour, and because he was committed to resisting to the utmost a split within the British Psycho-Analytical Society, James Strachey wanted to make both the papers and the ensuing discussions of the Controversies public through the As described here, that did not happen in a simple way but he succeeded in publishing papers directly related to the debate by fostering investigation into the subject of internal objects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!