Active participation of users in the evaluation of technical aids is essential, since they are part of the interface with the system and constitute a fundamental source of design criteria. In this study, 88 active users of wheelchairs were interviewed by means of a written questionnaire about their opinion concerning the adaptation of his/her wheelchair to the office workplace. A conceptual framework was introduced linking objective measurements of the user-wheelchair interface to the subjective preferences expressed by the user. Discriminant analysis was used in order to select and quantify the importance of the most significant factors influencing the user's opinions. Fuzzy logic was introduced for the qualitative interpretation of the relationship between those significant factors, based on an inductive algorithm for generating fuzzy rules. Fuzzy logic enables a person to model the uncertainty within the subjective formulation of knowledge or opinions. From the results, a mismatch between actual performance of conventional wheelchairs and requirements of office work became evident. The proposed methods make it possible to determine reliable rules explaining subjective preferences; thus, they provide a flexible means of interpreting user questionnaires and obtaining new design criteria.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fuzzy logic
12
qualitative interpretation
8
users wheelchairs
8
design criteria
8
subjective preferences
8
application fuzzy
4
logic techniques
4
techniques qualitative
4
interpretation preferences
4
preferences collective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!