Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: This study evaluated the amount of skeletal and dental widening of the mandible in the dog produced by using a tooth-borne distraction device.
Materials And Methods: Four adult mongrel dogs had osteotomies performed in the parasymphysis region and had a tooth-borne distraction appliance placed to widen the mandible 10 mm. The interarch distance between the canines and between the fourth premolar teeth, as well as between the intrabony markers, was compared.
Results: The canine teeth moved 95% of the distraction device movement, whereas the bone widened 55% of the distraction device movement. Histological evaluation showed woven bone formation within the distraction gap.
Conclusion: This study shows that a tooth-borne mandibular widening device will move the teeth significantly more than the bone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90110-0 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!