No-fault system of compensation for obstetric injury: winners and losers.

Obstet Gynecol

Center for Health Policy, Law and Management, and the Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.

Published: March 1998

Objective: To determine whether Florida's implementation of a no-fault system for birth-related neurologic injuries reduced lawsuits and total spending associated with such injuries, and whether no-fault was more efficient than tort in distributing compensation.

Methods: We compared claims and payments before and after implementation of a no-fault system in 1989. Data came from the Department of Insurance's medical malpractice closed claim files and no-fault records. Descriptive statistics were compiled for tort claims before 1989 and for tort and no-fault claims for 1989-1991. We developed two projection approaches to estimate claims and payments after 1989, with and without no-fault. We assessed the program's performance on the basis of comparisons of actual and projected values for 1989-1991.

Results: The number of tort claims for permanent labor-delivery injury and death fell 16-32%. However, when no-fault claims were added to tort claims, total claims frequency rose by 11-38%. Annually, an estimated 479 children suffered birth-related injuries; however, only 13 were compensated under no-fault. Total combined payments to patients and all lawyers did not decrease, but of the total, a much larger portion went to patients. Compensation of patients after plaintiff lawyers' fees rose 4% or 44%, depending on the projection method used. Less than 3% of total payments went to lawyers under no-fault versus 39% under tort.

Conclusion: Some claimants with birth-related injuries were winners, taking home a larger percentage of their awards than their tort counterparts. Lawyers clearly lost under no-fault. Because of the narrow statutory definition, many children with birth-related neurologic injuries did not qualify for coverage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00705-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

no-fault system
12
tort claims
12
no-fault
11
implementation no-fault
8
birth-related neurologic
8
neurologic injuries
8
claims
8
claims payments
8
no-fault claims
8
birth-related injuries
8

Similar Publications

This abstract presents a dataset for the detection of fault types in XLPE-covered conductors utilized in 22 kV medium voltage power distribution systems. We employed an antenna-based approach for detecting partial discharges. The dataset encompasses 12 distinct fault categories, ranging from ground phase faults to inter-phase faults, and no-fault case with steel or covered conductor as fault.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Do Vaccines Cause Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome? Review of Cases in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

Pediatr Neurol

December 2024

Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was created in 1986 to provide compensation for vaccine-related injuries, with over $6 billion paid out since its inception, but claims related to postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) have never been thoroughly reviewed.
  • A study analyzed 102 cases involving POTS claims, examining petitioners' theories linking vaccines (especially the HPV vaccine) to POTS, as well as the responses from medical experts and the final compensation decisions by the court.
  • Results showed that while petitioners’ experts often suggested vaccines could cause POTS through autoimmunity, none of the cases found direct evidence linking vaccines to the condition, indicating a need to reassess the
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Healthcare-associated infections are the main reported adverse event in healthcare, with significant economic costs that include those caused by medical malpractice claims. In Italy, there is a fault-based compensation system, but in this specific field, the burden of proof on the hospitals is particularly heavy. Hence, we aimed to verify the economic impact of the inclusion of experts in hospital infection surveillance into internal committees for claims assessment and to evaluate what would have been the economic impact of a mandatory no-fault system rather than the current system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mute by Visitation of God, Competency to Stand Trial and Fitness to Plead.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law

June 2024

Dr. Buchanan is a Professor of Psychiatry, in the Law and Psychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT and Associate Chief of Psychiatry, VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT.

Laws on competency to stand trial and fitness to plead are said to derive from "mute by visitation of God," a medieval English legal term referring to the inability to speak through no fault of one's own. The paper describes the relevant historical background, illustrative cases, and legal commentaries. Muteness by visitation of God arose to address a particular set of difficulties caused by the need to have medieval defendants agree to be tried.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In contemporary healthcare systems, the pursuit of justice intertwines with fault attribution and liability determination. The exploration of no-fault liability as a potential alternative within India's healthcare landscape delves into its feasibility and implications. Drawing from international experiences, regulatory frameworks, and societal readiness, the complexities and potential benefits of adopting a no-fault liability system are elucidated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!