Transurethral incision versus resection of the prostate for small to medium benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Objective: To compare the effects of transurethral incision and resection of the prostate in patients with small to medium benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Patients And Methods: Patients were assessed preoperatively using the Madsen-Iversen symptom score, post- void residual urine volume, urinary flow and cystoscopy. Those eligible for the study were randomized to undergo either transurethral incision or resection of the prostate. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 2-3.6, 12, 24 and 60 months post-operatively with an assessment by symptom score and urinary flow rate; most patients also underwent cystoscopy at 24 and 60 months.

Results: The maximum urinary flow rate was significantly higher in those undergoing resection than incision at all but the last follow-up visits. Cystoscopy 24 months after surgery showed adhesions between the lateral lobes, closed incisions or obstructing prostatic lobes in most of the patients undergoing incision, but not in those resected (P < 0.001, chi-square test). During follow-up, a second transurethral procedure was carried out for persistent or recurrent symptoms, combined with a maximum urinary flow rate of < 10.0 mL/s, in 10 patients who underwent incision and in three who were resected (P = 0.039, chi-square test).

Conclusion: Transurethral resection is preferable to transurethral incision of the prostate in the treatment of small to medium benign prostatic hyperplasia.