Objective: To study mass and mass distribution effect on function of below-knee prostheses.
Design: Design modifications were done to produce proximal center of mass location versus distal center of mass location variations, and prosthesis weight was modified from 42% to 70% of normal limb weight. Work across joints of affected and unaffected extremities was compared to assess the ability of the prosthesis to substitute for function loss.
Setting: University biomechanics laboratory.
Participants: Fifteen volunteers with below-knee amputations, residual limb length greater than 8.3 cm, but excluding Syme amputations.
Interventions: Patients walked with all configurations at self-selected walking speeds and 120 m/min.
Main Outcome Measures: Self-selected walking speed and metabolic efficiency. Work across the joints of affected and unaffected sides was compared.
Results: Proximal center of mass location produced a more efficient gait. Weight change from 42% to 70% of normal had no significant effect. Mechanical studies show that the prosthesis is a relatively poor substitute for the normal limb; most work is done by the nonamputated side. Particularly, the prosthesis failed to produce effective forward impulses on the body, resulting from push-off and deceleration of the swing leg.
Conclusions: For a proximal center of mass, lightweight distal components (e.g., feet) should be used; it is questionable whether further expenditure to develop ultralightweight prostheses would be cost effective for level walking.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90293-3 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!