In a previous study (Boquet et al., 1995, Molec. Immunol. 32, 303-308) we observed remarkable inversions of hydropathic profiles between complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of an anti-substance P monoclonal antibody (SP31) and the corresponding 5 amino acid C-terminal peptide epitope. Here we demonstrate the importance this hydropathic complementarity by measuring the immunoreactivity of SP-related peptides which have been modified in their C-terminal parts so that hydropathic profile has been conserved (by substituting amino acids in the epitope) or modified (by mixing the sequence of amino acids in the epitope). Experiments performed in equilibrium conditions using a competitive enzyme immunoassay showed that most of the peptides conserving the hydropathic profile of SP epitope were recognized by mAb SP31 (even if marked variations in affinity were observed), while those for which the hydropathic profile was modified exhibited very low or undetectable affinity. The kinetic parameters (ka and kd) of peptide-antibody interactions were determined using Surface Plasmon Resonance technology (BIACORE 2000). These measurements showed that all peptides recognized by mAb SP31 had similar association rate constants (close to 2 x 10[5] M[-1] s[-1]), differences in binding affinities essentially resulting from differences in dissociation rate constants (ranging from 1.61 x 10[-4] to 1.15 x 10[-1] s[-1]). From these results, it was concluded that hydropathic complementarity between the epitope and the paratope could be a necessary but not sufficient condition for establishing high-affinity binding. We hypothesize that hydropathic interactions may play a critical role during the first contacts between antibody CDRs and the peptide, possibly by favouring reorganization of water molecules at the antibody-peptide interface.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0161-5890(97)00119-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hydropathic complementarity
12
hydropathic profile
12
hydropathic
8
monoclonal antibody
8
amino acids
8
acids epitope
8
recognized mab
8
mab sp31
8
rate constants
8
epitope
5

Similar Publications

Intrinsic disorder in protein sense-antisense recognition.

J Mol Recognit

October 2020

Laboratory of New Methods in Biology, Institute for Biological Instrumentation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center "Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Pushchino, Russia.

In addition to the well-established sense-antisense complementarity abundantly present in the nucleic acid world and serving as a basic principle of the specific double-helical structure of DNA, production of mRNA, and genetic code-based biosynthesis of proteins, sense-antisense complementarity is also present in proteins, where sense and antisense peptides were shown to interact with each other with increased probability. In nucleic acids, sense-antisense complementarity is achieved via the Watson-Crick complementarity of the base pairs or nucleotide pairing. In proteins, the complementarity between sense and antisense peptides depends on a specific hydropathic pattern, where codons for hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids in a sense peptide are complemented by the codons for hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acids in its antisense counterpart.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Specificity, polyspecificity, and heterospecificity of antibody-antigen recognition.

J Mol Recognit

November 2014

Wallenberg Research Center, Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

The concept of antibody specificity is analyzed and shown to reside in the ability of an antibody to discriminate between two antigens. Initially, antibody specificity was attributed to sequence differences in complementarity determining regions (CDRs), but as increasing numbers of crystallographic antibody-antigen complexes were elucidated, specificity was analyzed in terms of six antigen-binding regions (ABRs) that only roughly correspond to CDRs. It was found that each ABR differs significantly in its amino acid composition and tends to bind different types of amino acids at the surface of proteins.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intuitive, but not simple: including explicit water molecules in protein-protein docking simulations improves model quality.

Proteins

June 2014

Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Institute for Structural Biology and Drug Discovery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23298-0540.

Characterizing the nature of interaction between proteins that have not been experimentally cocrystallized requires a computational docking approach that can successfully predict the spatial conformation adopted in the complex. In this work, the Hydropathic INTeractions (HINT) force field model was used for scoring docked models in a data set of 30 high-resolution crystallographically characterized "dry" protein-protein complexes and was shown to reliably identify native-like models. However, most current protein-protein docking algorithms fail to explicitly account for water molecules involved in bridging interactions that mediate and stabilize the association of the protein partners, so we used HINT to illuminate the physical and chemical properties of bridging waters and account for their energetic stabilizing contributions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this article, we address the problem of designing a string with optimal complementarity properties with respect to another given string according to a given criterion. The motivation comes from a drug design application, in which the complementarity between two sequences (proteins) is measured according to the values of the hydropathic coefficients associated with the sequence elements (amino acids). We present heuristic and exact optimization algorithms, and we report on some computational experiments on amino peptides taken from Semaphorin and human Interleukin-1β, which have already been investigated in the literature using heuristic algorithms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the post-genomic era, various computational methods that predict protein-protein interactions at the genome level are available; however, each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, resulting in false predictions. Here we developed a unique integrated approach to identify interacting partner(s) of Semaphorin 5A (SEMA5A), beginning with seven proteins sharing similar ligand interacting residues as putative binding partners. The methods include Dwyer and Root-Bernstein/Dillon theories of protein evolution, hydropathic complementarity of protein structure, pattern of protein functions among molecules, information on domain-domain interactions, co-expression of genes and protein evolution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!