Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The laparoscopic approach of the postoperative adhesions represents not only a way of diagnosing the pathogenic adhesions but also a superior alternative to the surgery of classical dissection of adhesions by laparotomy because of its obvious advantages: the evolution is simple, the bowel activity is quickly restored, the brief period of hospitalisation, the reduced risk of recurrence. The authors present their experience derived from the 29 laparoscopic adhesiolysis: 3 urgent cases with subocclusions, 6 when the surgical intervention was programmed, with a painful postoperative suffering, and 20 with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. From among these cases, a conversion and a postoperative complication were recorded. The result after a period of time are satisfactory.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!