Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy was adopted at our institution, because it was demonstrated to be more cost effective than standard open tracheostomy in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome and complication rate of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill patients. We performed a consecutive case study of all Level I trauma patients from August 1991 to May 1994 who underwent percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. All patients were prospectively evaluated by a standard questionnaire a minimum of 1 year after the procedure. All symptomatic patients were offered fiberoptic laryngoscopy. Descriptive statistical methods and the Student's T test were used to analyze the data. Of 7054 consecutive trauma admissions, 237 tracheostomies were performed. A total of 143 tracheostomies (60%) were open, and 95 (40%) were percutaneous. Of the 95 patients, 20 were lost to follow-up, 12 died from causes unrelated to the procedure, 6 had severe traumatic brain injuries and were unable to participate, and 2 patients required conversion to an open procedure. This left a study group of 55 patients. At a minimum of 1 year follow-up, 40 patients (73%) were asymptomatic. Of the 15 (27%) symptomatic patients, two patients had acute airway compromise after decannulation secondary to subglottic stenosis. Both were recannulated and subsequently decannulated uneventfully. Six patients declined fiberoptic laryngoscopy, because their symptoms were minimal (minor voice changes in three and intermittent hoarseness in three). Nine patients underwent fiberoptic laryngoscopy, and all examinations were normal. The mean cost of standard open tracheostomy at our institution is $1134 (58%) more than the mean cost of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Of the study group patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, 27 per cent complained of symptoms a minimum of 1 year posttracheostomy. Of these patients, 60 per cent underwent fiberoptic laryngoscopy, and no subglottic lesions were identified. Our findings suggest that percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is a safe, cost-effective alternative to standard tracheostomy in critically ill patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Clin Med
January 2025
Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, 1 Efron St. Bat Galim, Haifa 3525433, Israel.
: Patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) often experience high rates of thrombocytopenia, thrombocytopathy, anemia, leukopenia, and coagulopathy, which can significantly increase the risk of procedural and postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in critically ill patients with HM. : This retrospective cohort study included patients with HM who underwent PDT between 2012 and 2023 at a tertiary academic center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurointerv Surg
January 2025
Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Henan Provincial Cerebrovascular Interventional Innovation Engineering Technology Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Objective: This study aimed to examine the effect of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) on vascular luminal dilatational remodeling (VLDR) following simple balloon angioplasty.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients diagnosed with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), who were treated exclusively with balloon angioplasty at Henan Provincial People's Hospital between June 2019 and April 2023. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to create balanced cohorts of patients who underwent drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA).
ANZ J Surg
December 2024
Department of Trauma Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Centre, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Background: Tracheostomy is performed in patients with trauma who need prolonged ventilation for respiratory failure or airway management. Although it has benefits, such as reduced sedation and easier care, it also has risks. This study explored the unclear timing, technique, and patient selection criteria for tracheostomy in patients with trauma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Bronchology Interv Pulmonol
January 2025
Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
J Clin Anesth
December 2024
Department of Internal Medicine I, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology, and Infectious diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address:
Background: Detailed reports are scarce on minimally-invasive tracheostomy (MIT) techniques for critically ill patients with challenging anatomy or complex coagulopathies. In such high-risk patients, conventional percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) may lead to severe complications.
Methods: Aiming to broaden the scope of MIT for patients previously excluded due to high risks, we developed a new care bundle (MIT technique), specifically designed for intensive care specialists.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!