A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Young tenosuspension in the treatment of abnormal pronation of the foot. | LitMetric

The Young tenosuspension in the treatment of abnormal pronation of the foot.

J Foot Ankle Surg

5th Division of the Gaetano Pini Orthopaedic Institute, Orthopaedic Clinic of the University of Milan Medical School, Italy.

Published: February 1998

The intent of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Young tenosuspension for the control of abnormal subtalar joint pronation. Two series of 15 feet of patients aged 10 to 16 years were selected. Patients in the first series had been operated on with a combination of tendo Achillis lengthening and subtalar arthroereisis, while those of the second series had these same procedures along with a Young tenosuspension. All cases had been reviewed in June and July of 1994, both clinically and radiographically. The follow-up period ranged from 1.5 to 8.6 years. The authors found at follow-up a statistically significant improvement in both series of patients. There were no significant differences, however, when comparing the results of the two series with the exception of the reduction in forefoot supination, which was statistically greater (p < 0.05) in patients on which the Young tenosuspension had been performed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1067-2516(97)80090-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

young tenosuspension
16
series
5
young
4
tenosuspension treatment
4
treatment abnormal
4
abnormal pronation
4
pronation foot
4
foot intent
4
intent retrospective
4
retrospective study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!