Background: Tumescent liposuction has proven to be an extremely safe and effective method of liposuction. However, the infusion of tumescent anesthesia can take 1 hour or more to complete.

Objective: To document the types, dosages, and routes of administration of premedication utilized by four experienced tumescent liposuction surgeons. To determine if infusion rates for tumescent anesthesia are affected by types of premedication.

Methods: Four experienced liposuction surgeons were asked to review their most recent 100 tumescent liposuction patients with respect to types and dosages of premedication and routes of administration. Data were also provided on corresponding infusion pump settings and infusion rates. Volumes of tumescent anesthesia and corresponding volumes of fat aspirated were also collected on the same 400 patients.

Results: Infusion of tumescent anesthesia could be performed more rapidly in patients who were given greater amounts of premedication. Volumes of tumescent anesthesia infused were generally two or more times the volume of fat aspirated. Patients could be infused with less premedication if slow infiltration was employed.

Conclusion: Infusion rates for tumescent anesthesia can be increased of greater amounts of premedication are given. However, this must be balanced against the safety of the premedication.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00462.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tumescent anesthesia
24
infusion rates
16
tumescent liposuction
16
tumescent
10
infusion tumescent
8
types dosages
8
routes administration
8
liposuction surgeons
8
rates tumescent
8
volumes tumescent
8

Similar Publications

The effectiveness of tumescent anesthesia in managing pain for enzymatic debridement of burns. A case-control study.

Burns

December 2024

Burn & Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery,Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, Via Messina 829, Catania, Italy.

Introduction: Burn injuries are a global health challenge, causing significant pain, tissue damage and complex wound management issues. Traditional treatments like surgical debridement, while effective, pose challenges such as blood loss, grafting requirements, and prolonged hospital stays. Enzymatic debridement, such as the Nexobrid procedure, effectively removes necrotic tissue but can be painful for patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most feared complications of abdominoplasty, and multiple studies in the plastic surgery literature have sought to prevent these complications. General inhalational anesthesia can increase the risk of VTE via a variety of mechanisms. This study evaluates whether performing abdominoplasties under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) instead of general inhalational anesthesia can reduce the risk of VTE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Aim: To compare the effectiveness of tumescent anesthesia and regional anesthesia under ultrasound guidance in terms of their impact on nociceptive and stress systems, as well as systemic hemodynamics, in patients with chronic venous disease of the lower extremities, undergoing surgical treatment.

Patients And Methods: Materials and Methods: Fifty patients (average age 48 ±15 years; 19 [38 %] males and 31 [62 %] females) with chronic venous disease of the lower extremities, who underwent surgical treatment (endovenous laser ablation and miniphlebectomy on one limb), were examined. Twenty-five patients (main group) underwent surgery under femoral nerve block with 150 mg of lidocaine and sciatic nerve block (popliteal fossa) with 150 mg of lidocaine under ultrasound guidance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Treatment of symptomatic varicose veins has changed dramatically in the last few years with guidelines now recommending endovenous surgery as first-line intervention. Previously, this was achieved by laser or radiofrequency ablation of the target vein, requiring infiltration of tumescent anesthesia to reduce the risks of thermal damage to surrounding tissue. Endovenous cyanoacrylate injection (VenaSeal™) is a nonthermal, nontumescent endovenous closure technique, increasing patient comfort and is readily performed under local anesthesia only and thus is a feasible technique for in-room treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!