Cerebral infarction vs. intracranial hemorrhage--validity of clinical diagnosis.

Vojnosanit Pregl

Military Medical Academy, Department of Neurology, Institute for radiology, Belgrade.

Published: January 1998

In aim to improve the validity of clinical diagnosis of acute supratentorial ischemic cerebral infarction vs. intracranial hemorrhage, two different scoring systems were analyzed, each separately and combined, on one hundred eighty-eight patients sample. Results suggested higher sensitivity and positive predictive value for Guy's Hospital score, giving it higher importance in detection of hemorrhage, while combined application of both systems, in cases with identical findings, provided sensitivity 0.95 and 0.92 negative predictive value, in certain diagnosis category. A review of complete results disclosed that application of both systems separately didn't provide satisfactory diagnostic gain in differential diagnosis of that syndrome on our sample, while combined application provided high level of accuracy, eliminating simultaneously a significant proportion of patients (43.62%), as a category of uncertain diagnosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cerebral infarction
8
infarction intracranial
8
clinical diagnosis
8
combined application
8
application systems
8
diagnosis
5
intracranial hemorrhage--validity
4
hemorrhage--validity clinical
4
diagnosis aim
4
aim improve
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!