A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Automatic setting of the contrast range of whole body scintigrams using a histogram method]. | LitMetric

Aim: To get standardised results on the display of whole body scintigrams regarding an optimal contrast setting (using linear scaling), an algorithm was developed, which can be used for an automatic setting of an upper intensity truncation value.

Methods: From the integral of the gray level histogram of 30 randomly selected whole body images upper threshold values LA were defined, where a certain area percentage A (80% < or = A < or = 99.5%) of all pixels with intensity > 0 are contained in the intensity range. Independently an interactive upper level Lvis of the contrast range was determined by two observers to get an optimal visual appearance of the image.

Results: For the threshold levels with an area percentage A of 92% ... 98% (L92 ... L98) a very close linear correlation (r > 0.9) was found to the visual levels. Levels resulting to area percentages A < 92% or A > 98% correlated worse to the interactive values. Based on our results we propose as a good definition for an upper threshold on whole body scintigrams with dual intensity ranges: Range 1 (high activities): Upper threshold = min (2.5 x L95, 100%), Range 2 (low activities): Upper threshold = min (1.25 x L95, 100%).

Conclusion: The procedure is well suited for an automatic definition of the contrast settings of whole body scintigrams. It can be implemented easily; its use gives a substantial contribution to the standardisation of the documentation of scintigrams.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body scintigrams
16
upper threshold
16
contrast range
8
area percentage
8
levels area
8
92% 98%
8
activities upper
8
threshold min
8
upper
6
range
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!