This study assessed the accuracy of the "screen" versus "metric" portions of eight subtests of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE). As part of a routine hospital assessment, 95 male patients were administered both portions of the instrument regardless of outcome on the screen. Results indicate that the screen items of some of the NCSE subtests produced a relatively high false negative rate, where the screen was passed, but the metric was failed. It is recommended that all items of the subtests be administered to more fully assess each domain and, therefore, reduce the probability of overlooking significant deficits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199711)53:7<733::aid-jclp11>3.0.co;2-mDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neurobehavioral cognitive
8
cognitive status
8
status examination
8
examination accuracy
4
accuracy "screen-metric"
4
"screen-metric" approach
4
approach clinical
4
clinical sample
4
sample study
4
study assessed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!