A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Role of endorectal ultrasonography and CT in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Personal experience]. | LitMetric

We report our personal experience on endorectal US and CT in the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. Our series includes 64 cases (38 male and 26 female) evaluated with intrarectal sonography; 38 of these patients underwent also CT-study of the lower abdomen. Using both imaging techniques infiltration of the rectal wall and adjacent structures and lymph node involvement were studied. The results of our study refer to 58 patients who underwent endorectal US, 31 of whom studied also with CT. Referring to the T-parameter with ultrasound 41 correct diagnosis were obtained, in 13 cases the lesion was over-staged and in 4 cases understaged. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy was respectively 89.5%, 60% and 79.3%. With CT 23 diagnosis were correct, in 1 case the lesion was overstaged and in 7 cases understaged; sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy concerning rectal wall infiltration were respectively 72%, 83.3% and 74.2%. The evaluation of the N-parameter demonstrated low value of sensitivity with both US (15.8%) and CT (42.9%). Considering the results of our series, we feel that it is necessary to use both imaging techniques because results obtained are complementary referring to the T-parameter, although N-parameter were a little significant.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preoperative staging
8
staging rectal
8
patients underwent
8
imaging techniques
8
rectal wall
8
referring t-parameter
8
cases understaged
8
understaged sensitivity
8
sensitivity specificity
8
specificity diagnostic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!