Objective: To assess whether patients with pancreatic cancer-associated pain living near a pain control center were more likely to undergo neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) than those living at a distance and to determine the rationale of physicians at our institution for referring patients for NCPB.
Design: We retrospectively reviewed the frequency of use of NCPB in patients with pancreatic cancer and conducted an anonymous physician survey of referral patterns for NCPB for such patients.
Material And Methods: A prospective database of medical diagnoses and a clinical database at our institution were used to identify patients with pancreatic cancer within three geographic regions who were assessed during the inclusive years 1980 through 1989: group I ("local") = all patient with pancreatic cancer in Olmsted County, Minnesota; group II ("surrounding") and group III ("distant") = patients referred for pancreatic cancer evaluation who lived within 100 miles of our institution (excluding Olmsted County) or more than 100 miles from our institution, respectively. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to assess the use of NCPB at any time during the course of pancreatic cancer. For the physician survey component, all medical oncologists, gastroenterologists, and general surgeons at our institution who might be responsible for the care of patients with pancreatic cancer were sent a questionnaire about their referral patterns for NCPB among patients with pancreatic cancer.
Results: Overall, approximately 15% of the 292 patients with pancreatic cancer studied underwent NCPB. Distance from our pain control center was not found to be associated with frequency of use of NCPB. Of the 78 physicians surveyed, 59 (76%) responded, and 35 of the responders (59%) had encountered at least 1 patient with pancreatic cancer during the preceding 12 months. In that subset of physicians, perceived barriers for referral for NCPB were limited appointment availability and need for repeating the procedure.
Conclusion: On the basis of this study, referral patterns for NCPB in patients with pancreatic cancer do not seem to be associated with the geographic distance of a patient's residence from a pain control center. Improving appointment availability for NCPB might increase the number of patients offered this technique for control of pain.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4065/72.9.831 | DOI Listing |
Ann Surg Oncol
January 2025
Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Discov Oncol
January 2025
Department of Laboratory, the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 382, Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Background: Pancreatic cancer (PAC) has a complex tumor immune microenvironment, and currently, there is a lack of accurate personalized treatment. Establishing a novel consensus machine learning driven signature (CMLS) that offers a unique predictive model and possible treatment targets for this condition was the goal of this study.
Methods: This study integrated multiple omics data of PAC patients, applied ten clustering techniques and ten machine learning approaches to construct molecular subtypes for PAC, and created a new CMLS.
mSphere
January 2025
State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Center for Single-Cell Omics, School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ningning Liu works in the field of fungal infection and cancer progression, with a particular focus on the mechanism of host-pathogen interaction. In this mSphere of influence article, he reflects on how papers entitled "The fungal mycobiome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via activation of MBL," by B. Aykut, S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Cureus
January 2025
Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Background The relationship between physical activity and incident pancreatic cancer is poorly defined, and the evidence to date is inconsistent, largely due to small sample sizes and insufficient incident outcomes. Using the UK Biobank cohort dataset, the association between physical activity levels at recruitment and incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at follow-up was analysed. Method Physical activity, the key exposure, was quantified using Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) values and categorised into walking, moderate, and vigorous activity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!