Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Different totally implantable arterial infusion systems were compared in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer undergoing continuous intra-arterial infusion. Seventy-eight patients received continuous FUdR infusion using either totally implantable pumps (group a = 44 pts.) or ports fed by external portable pumps (group b = 34 pts.), and 57 patients received bolus infusion of Cisplatin (group c). Devices were cared for patency even after interruption of treatment, commonly caused by disease progression. Pocket problems most frequently occurred in group a (30%) compared to groups b (9%) and c (7%), whereas a higher incidence of catheter and infusion related problems was observed in group b (109%). System failure was recorded as a cause of interruption of treatment in two, 9, and 6 cases in groups a to c, respectively. The 12-months patency rate was 92% in group a, 24% in group b (median 9 months), and 65% in group c (median 17 months). Though implantable ports allow adequate infusion periods in most cases they seem more adequate for bolus infusions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!