For optical systems consisting of separated obliquely crossed toric interfaces, the equivalent dioptric power has principal meridians that are not necessarily orthogonal to each other. In this case it takes four parameters to specify the equivalent power. A set of parameters convenient for ophthalmic optics consists of three traditional spherocylindrical parameters SC x theta together with a dioptric asymmetry parameter g. The parameter g has been described as "so far" being entirely mathematical in nature. The purpose of this paper is to develop further optical knowledge about the equivalent power asymmetry g. The method was a theoretical and numerical study involving optics and the dioptric power matrix theory. Among the results of this study are a number of new equations involving g that clarify the relationships between the nonorthogonal principal meridians and the power and axis meridians of SC x theta, as well as explicitly illustrating the parameters that can increase or decrease g. It is also pointed out that the asymmetry g is formally identical to the circular astigmatism that has previously been presented in discussions of ray vector deflection fields (and is used in the Humphrey Lens Analyzer measurements). In conclusions, the theoretical relations presented here provide optical insight into the equivalent dioptric power asymmetry and the parameter g. The relations and insight can assist further developments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199706000-00022 | DOI Listing |
Specimen-induced aberrations limit the penetration depth of standard optical imaging techniques in vivo, mainly due to the propagation of high NA beams in a non-homogenous medium. Overcoming these limitations requires complex optical imaging systems and techniques. Implantable high NA micro-optics can be a solution to tissue induced spherical aberrations, but in order to be implanted, they need to have reduced complexity, offering a lower surface to the host immune reaction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
January 2025
Department of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States.
Purpose: Severely myopic eyes have been associated with high posterior capsule opacification (PCO) incidence. Although it has been reported that myopic eyes have weaker or more delayed capsule adhesion than emmetropic eyes, it is unclear whether/how dioptric power and posterior curvature of IOLs affect IOLs' affinity for the posterior lens capsule (PLC) and their PCO potential.
Methods: To investigate this, acrylic foldable IOLs with increasing dioptric power of 6.
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan430060, China.
Refractive error is a key determinant of visual acuity post-cataract surgery. Traditional methods for addressing refractive errors have been invasive, posing the risk of permanent surgical complications. Thus, the pursuit of non-invasive techniques for correcting refractive errors after cataract surgery is of significant clinical importance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransl Vis Sci Technol
December 2024
Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Purpose: We evaluated through-focus visual performance and accommodative response in young subjects through three segmented multifocal designs for myopia control, mapped on the spatial light modulator of a monocular adaptive optics visual simulator (AOVS), and compared with single vision (SV).
Methods: The segmented multifocal patterns included a 4 mm diameter center distance zone and offset peripheral defocus (MP1), astigmatism and coma (MP2), or a combination (MP3). High-contrast logMAR visual acuity (VA) was measured with monochromatic stimuli (555 nm).
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
January 2025
Visual Optics Lab Antwerp (VOLANTIS), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Purpose: During refractive development, eye growth is controlled by a combination of genetically pre-programmed processes and retinal feedback to minimise the refractive error. This work presents a basic differential model of how this process may take place.
Methods: The description starts from two bi-exponential descriptions of the axial power P (or dioptric distance) and total refractive power P, the difference between which corresponds with the spherical refractive error S.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!