The spinal cord contains endogenous substances (such as cholecystokinin, FMRFamide, etc.) that can block the analgesic effects of opiates. Anti-opiate actions have been most commonly studied by exogenous administration of receptor agonists and receptor antagonists of these substances. However, we have recently demonstrated that anti-analgesia can be brought under environmental control through Pavlovian conditioning. Whereas analgesia can be conditioned to signals for danger, anti-analgesia can be conditioned to signals for safety. Using this paradigm, we have previously demonstrated that conditioned anti-analgesia can reverse a variety of opiate analgesic states, including those produced by conditioned danger signals, systemic morphine, and intrathecal mu- and delta-opiate receptor agonists. These data raise the question of the generality of anti-analgesia actions. The present series of experiments examined the ability of conditioned anti-analgesia to affect non-opiate analgesic states induced by spinal delivery of GABA(A), GABA(B), 5HT2 + 5HT1, and 5HT3 receptor agonists. While conditioned anti-analgesia had no effect on GABA(A) or 5HT2 + 5HT1 non-opiate analgesias, conditioned anti-analgesia completely blocked GABA(B) and 5HT3 non-opiate analgesias. These findings clearly demonstrate that conditioned anti-analgesia can powerfully modulate non-opiate as well as opiate analgesias and bring into question whether putative anti-opiate neuroactive substances may have broader actions than previously suggested.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(97)03375-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conditioned anti-analgesia
24
receptor agonists
12
conditioned
9
anti-analgesia
9
spinal cord
8
analgesia conditioned
8
conditioned signals
8
analgesic states
8
5ht2 5ht1
8
non-opiate analgesias
8

Similar Publications

Inhibition of morphine analgesia by LPS: role of opioid and NMDA receptors and spinal glia.

Behav Brain Res

January 2005

School of Psychology, Griffith Taylor Building, A19, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of toxins, such as the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is associated with a well-characterized increase in sensitivity to painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) [Watkins LR, Maier SF, Goehler LE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anti-analgesic and anti-amnesic effect of complement C3a.

Life Sci

September 2000

Research Institute for Food Science, Kyoto University, Uji, Japan.

In the present study, we found that complement C3a exerted central effects after intracerebroventricular administration in mice. At doses of 3 and 10 pmol/mouse, the peptide showed an antagonistic effect on analgesia induced by morphine and U-50488H, known to be mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists, respectively. Moreover, complement C3a improved scopolamine- and ischemia-induced amnesia at a dose of 10 pmol/mouse.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The spinal cord contains endogenous substances (such as cholecystokinin, FMRFamide, etc.) that can block the analgesic effects of opiates. Anti-opiate actions have been most commonly studied by exogenous administration of receptor agonists and receptor antagonists of these substances.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The central nervous system contains circuitry that inhibits pain sensitivity (analgesia), as well as circuitry that opposes pain inhibition (anti-analgesia). Activation of analgesia systems and anti-analgesia systems can each be brought under environmental control using classical conditioning procedures. Analgesia can be produced by cues present before and during aversive events such as electric shock, while active inhibition of analgesia comes to be produced by cues never present immediately before or during shock and therefore signal safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!