Implementation of a 'population responsibility' principle in Finnish health centres began in the late 1980s. The aim of this study was to describe public health nurses' (PHNs') experiences of primary health care based on this principle and to identify contextual and personal factors related to their experiences. The sample consisted of PHNs in 10 health centres. A questionnaire was developed based on a qualitative study. The survey was conducted in 1990 and repeated in 1992. The response rate was 84% for the 1990 sample (n = 102) and 91% for the 1992 sample (n = 131). In the multivariate analysis of variance type of community (urban/rural), size of the target population, task division model and existence of regular teamwork between social and health care personnel were chosen as contextual factors studied. Age, length of professional experience and having specialist education in midwifery were chosen as personal factors. Dependent variables were subscales on: experiences of planning and implementation, perceived influence of population responsibility on nurse-client relationships, comparison with previous experiences, views and experiences on comprehensiveness of care and job satisfaction. The majority of the PHNs experienced only minor changes in their work after the implementation of population responsibility. They were most critical about the way these changes were planned and implemented. Changes were mainly perceived as positive. There were some differences in the two samples, reflecting a shift from both positive and negative responses towards more neutral or more positive responses. Several contextual factors were multi-dimensionally related to the PHNs' experiences.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026041.x | DOI Listing |
Purpose: To describe relationships among grit, spirituality, and hope in women Veterans ( = 80).
Method: A descriptive, correlational design was used. Study variables were measured with the Short Grit Scale, Daily Spiritual Experience Scale, and Hope Scale.
JMIR Form Res
January 2025
Center for Cancer Health Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Background: Cervical cancer disparities persist among minoritized women due to infrequent screening and poor follow-up. Structural and psychosocial barriers to following up with colposcopy are problematic for minoritized women. Evidence-based interventions using patient navigation and tailored telephone counseling, including the Tailored Communication for Cervical Cancer Risk (TC3), have modestly improved colposcopy attendance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Internet Res
January 2025
Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Background: If the most evidence-based and effective smoking cessation apps are not selected by smokers wanting to quit, their potential to support cessation is limited.
Objective: This study sought to determine the attributes that influence smoking cessation app uptake and understand their relative importance to support future efforts to present evidence-based apps more effectively to maximize uptake.
Methods: Adult smokers from the United Kingdom were invited to participate in a discrete choice experiment.
Diabetes Care
January 2025
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Importance: Fragility fractures result in significant morbidity.
Objective: To review evidence on osteoporosis screening to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and trial registries through January 9, 2024; references, experts, and literature surveillance through July 31, 2024.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!