Objective: The objective of this study was to ascertain the degree of agreement between four self-report depression scales, with particular emphasis on whether each scale would identify the same subgroup of women as being 'most depressed'.

Method: The questionnaires were administered to a sample of approximately 200 postnatal women at 4 weeks, 4 months and 8 months after delivery. The instruments were: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale; and the depression subscale of the Profile of Mood States.

Results: Agreement between pairs of instruments, in terms of identifying the most depressed subgroup of women in the cohort, only averaged approximately 40%. Agreement between the three instruments was only about 25%.

Conclusions: This poor level of agreement most likely reflects the different emphasis in item content of the questionnaires, which in turn reflects different notions of 'depression' held by the designers of the instruments. The implications of the findings for research and clinical practice are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00048679709073844DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

depression scale
12
subgroup women
8
scale depression
8
depression subscale
8
depression
6
assessment depression
4
depression postnatal
4
postnatal period
4
period comparison
4
comparison self-report
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!