A comparative evaluation of vaccination methods with glycoproteins for the induction of immune responses and protection of the pig against Aujeszky's disease virus (ADV) was performed. Different vaccination routes (intradermal (i.d.) versus intramuscular (i.m.)), inoculation sites (the neck versus the back) and number of inoculation points (2 versus 6) per site were compared. Body weight (BW) changes and viral excretion after challenge were compared with virus-neutralizing titers, antigen-specific IgG and IgA responses in serum and virus-specific lymphoproliferative responses in peripheral blood during the immunisation period. According to BW changes better protection was obtained with six-point than two-point i.d. injections. i.d. vaccination in the back at six points gave similar results as i.m. vaccination in the neck but appeared inferior in the reduction of virus excretion. Regarding the immunological parameters, the virus-specific IgA response in serum gave the best indication for protection. It can be concluded that according to BW changes, six-point i.d. immunisation in the back and i.m. immunisation in the neck provided the best protection and that six-point i.d. injections resulted in a better vaccination than two-point i.d. injections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(96)01300-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vaccination methods
8
methods glycoproteins
8
aujeszky's disease
8
protection six-point
8
two-point injections
8
vaccination
6
evaluation parenteral
4
parenteral vaccination
4
glycoproteins aujeszky's
4
disease pigs
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!