A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Simultaneous treatment with BDNF and CNTF after peripheral nerve transection and repair enhances rate of functional recovery compared with BDNF treatment alone. | LitMetric

The objective was to investigate the effects of brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) and ciliary neurotropic factor (CNTF) on peripheral nerve regeneration. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats underwent left sciatic nerve transection and repair according to three experimental groups: epineurial coaptation (EC), EC with BDNF delivered by an osmotic pump (EC-BDNF), and EC with BDNF and CNTF delivered similarly (EC-BDNF/CNTF). Nerve regeneration was assessed using sciatic functional indices, quantitative histomorphology, and molecular analysis for proteins associated with nerve regeneration. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing all groups at each time point demonstrated significant differences between groups on days 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 80. A paired, two-tailed Student's t-test with the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons demonstrated that at 40 days postoperatively, animals in the EC-BDNF/CNTF group (n = 7) manifested superior functional recovery compared with those in the EC group (n = 9) and those in the EC-BDNF group (n = 9) (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). At 80 days, the animals in both the EC-BDNF (P < 0.01) and EC-BDNF/CNTF (P < 0.05) groups demonstrated greater functional recovery compared with those in the EC group, with no significant difference between the two factor groups at the endpoint. Morphometric analysis demonstrated that nerves from animals in the EC-BDNF/CNTF group had the largest mean axon diameters as compared with those from the EC (proximal: P < 0.001, distal: P < 0.05) and EC-BDNF (proximal: P < 0.01) groups. No significant differences were seen in nerve cross-sectional area. In distal nerve segments, Western blot analysis revealed that expression of myelin-associated glycoprotein was higher than control for the EC group and lower than control for both the EC-BDNF and EC-BDNF/CNTF groups. We conclude that BDNF/CNTF combined treatment increases the early rate of functional sciatic nerve regeneration over treatment with BDNF alone, although the degree of maximal recovery was similar at the conclusion of the experiment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199707000-00029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nerve regeneration
16
functional recovery
12
recovery compared
12
treatment bdnf
8
bdnf cntf
8
cntf peripheral
8
nerve
8
peripheral nerve
8
nerve transection
8
transection repair
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!