Vasoconstrictor infiltration in breast reduction surgery: is it harmful?

Br J Plast Surg

Department of Plastic Surgery, Shotley Bridge Hospital, Consett, UK.

Published: June 1997

The efficacy of vasoconstrictor infiltration in reducing blood loss is well known. However, adrenaline infiltration is potentially harmful to tissues. The question of whether or not adrenaline infiltration is harmful in breast reduction surgery remains unanswered. We retrospectively reviewed the notes of 100 consecutive cases after bilateral breast reduction (n = 200 breasts) with preoperative infiltration of a vasoconstrictor solution (10 ml adrenaline 1:10,000, 20 ml lignocaine 1%, 70 ml saline 0.9%, resulting in an adrenaline concentration of 1:100,000), looking specifically at postoperative complications that could be secondary to adrenaline infiltration. Two breasts developed a 'haematoma'; both were of small volume. Six breasts developed a 'minimal wound' problem which involved the T-junction. 'Wound breakdown' was noted in five breasts and again involved the T-junction in most cases. 'Wound infection' occurred in eleven breasts. There was one case of partial 'nipple necrosis'. Complications occurred in 12.5% of breasts and 21% of patients. We feel that this complication rate is within acceptable limits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1226(97)91156-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast reduction
12
adrenaline infiltration
12
vasoconstrictor infiltration
8
reduction surgery
8
infiltration harmful
8
breasts developed
8
involved t-junction
8
breasts
6
infiltration
5
adrenaline
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!