This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after lumbar laminectomy. Thirty ASA physical status I adults undergoing elective lumbar laminectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group 1 (study group) received 3 mg epidural morphine preemptively 60 min before surgery, followed by epidural placebo at the end of surgery. Group 2 (control group) received epidural placebo at the same time preoperatively as the study group, followed by 3 mg epidural morphine at the conclusion of surgery. Pain was assessed using visual analog scales (VAS), and sedation was graded on a 4-point rank drowsiness score. Time to first postoperative analgesic (TFA), the supplementary analgesia, and the amount of morphine used over the 24-h period were noted for the groups. VAS pain scores were significantly less in Group 1 (preemptive group) than in Group 2 8 h after surgery (P < 0.05). TFA in the study group (19.9 +/- 2.3 h) was significantly prolonged compared with the control group (8.5 +/- 1.0 h, P < 0.05). The demand for supplementary analgesia and postoperative morphine consumption in the preemptive group was significantly lower than that in control group (P < 0.05). Patients in the control group were significantly sedated after 12 h and had a high incidence of nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05). The study shows that preemptive epidural morphine is superior to epidural morphine given postoperatively for pain relief after lumbar laminectomy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199707000-00024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epidural morphine
24
lumbar laminectomy
16
control group
16
group
13
preemptive epidural
12
study group
12
morphine
8
morphine postoperative
8
pain relief
8
relief lumbar
8

Similar Publications

Higher intraoperative opioid doses may be associated with worse long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the impact of higher doses of intraoperative opioids and type of anesthesia on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and mortality after RP in a high-volume tertiary center. All patients underwent RP at our center between 2015 and 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: It has been recognized that the type of anesthetic and analgesic technique and the relative pain degree may have an influence on hyperglycemic-stress response to surgery. This comparative study aimed to assess glucose levels in both mothers and infants during normal vaginal delivery. This study aimed to investigate this stress response between mothers who received parenteral analgesia versus epidural analgesia (EA) as an objective reflection for pain response.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is essential for ensuring patient safety during scoliosis surgery by monitoring spinal cord and nerve function through motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), with anesthesia type affecting the accuracy of these signals.
  • A systematic review was carried out, analyzing studies from major medical databases, which evaluated the impact of various anesthetic techniques on neuromonitoring during scoliosis procedures, narrowing down from 998 articles to 45 for detailed analysis.
  • The findings suggest that the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) offers significant advantages over traditional spinal and epidural anesthesia by improving neuromonitoring accuracy, reducing complications, and providing effective pain management, leading to better patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!