Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Although the internal mammary artery (IMA) as a coronary graft offers better long-term patency than the saphenous vein, a factor limiting its use has been the length of the artery's pedicle. In an attempt to overcome this limitation, we evaluated the use of retrograde right IMA in a prospective study. In ten patients scheduled for routine coronary artery bypass surgery, bilateral IMA grafting was used, the left IMA in routine fashion, but the right IMA dissected from the level of the first rib, cut there and placed as an inverted graft. Three months postoperatively the patients were clinically evaluated with stress exercise test (n = 10) and coronary angiography (n = 9). No patient had recurrence of angina. Angiography revealed patency of the retrograde right IMA graft in six of nine patients. On the basis of these data we do not recommend routine use of retrograde IMA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14017439709058077 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!