Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Lamotrigine (LG), phenytoin (PY), carbamazepine (CM), and carbamazepine epoxide (CE) are measured with an optimized procedure that uses thin sorbent extraction disks and a highly selective, sterically protected bonded silica high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column. Routinely, serum (200 microliters at pH 6.8 with cyheptamide as internal standard) is applied to an Empore octyl (C8) solid-phase extraction disk to isolate the drugs. a water wash removes interferences, and the retained drugs are eluted with a small volume of solvent. The eluate is directly injected onto a Zorbax Stable Bond cyanopropyl HPLC column with quantification at 214 nm. Evaporation-concentration steps are unnecessary. Overall, for all drugs, between-run precision coefficients of variation (n = 16 each) ranged from 2.1% to 4.9% at concentrations from 0.75 to 20.5 mg/l; extraction recoveries fell within a range of 96% to 110% at concentrations of 2, 10, and 30 mg/l tested for each drug; the lowest limit of detection was 0.15 to 0.35 mg/l. The analytical response was linear for each drug > 80 mg/l (LG) and > 50 mg/l (PY, CM, and CE). Optimization graphs are presented to illustrate the rationale for selection of test parameters for a robust method. In addition, a comparison study between two commercial laboratories demonstrates accuracy problems associated with LG testing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199706000-00009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!