In a variety of ways attention is being drawn nowadays to the fact that Pieter van Foreest (1521-1597) died four hundred years ago. The question arises, however, whether such a comprehensive commemoration is justified by Van Foreest's contribution to the development of medical science. Medical history certainly does not attribute concrete substantial new findings to his name. Nevertheless, he earned the longstanding epithet 'Dutch Hippocrates' by his writings. Especially, his Observationes et curationes medicinales c.q. chirurgicales remained on vogue for some centuries after his death, mainly due to the accurate description of symptomatology of a wide variety of diseases. Van Foreest should be considered as a conspicuous representative of the new empirical medicine which gained favour after the humanistic rediscovery of the classical Greek authors, especially Hippocrates.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
BMC Public Health
September 2024
Arbo Unie, Laan Corpus Den Hoorn 102, 4, Groningen, 9728 JR, the Netherlands.
BMC Public Health
January 2024
Arbo Unie, Laan Corpus Den Hoorn 102, 4, Groningen, 9728 JR, the Netherlands.
Purpose: Sickness absence is a major public health problem, given its high cost and negative impact on employee well-being. Understanding sickness absence duration and recovery rates among different groups is useful to develop effective strategies for enhancing recovery and reducing costs related to sickness absence.
Methods: Our study analyzed data from a large occupational health service, including over 5 million sick-listed employees from 2010 to 2020, out of which almost 600,000 cases were diagnosed by an occupational health physician.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!