Background: A prospective study including 272 patients with suspected appendicitis was performed. The aims were to evaluate the representativity of the study group and to compare diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy with conventional appendicectomy.

Methods: The study was an open, randomized, single-centre trial with sequential design. One hundred and eight patients were randomized between laparoscopy or conventional appendicectomy, of whom 84 had acute appendicitis. Duration of postoperative convalescence was the major endpoint.

Results: The study patients were representative of the eligible population regarding age and stage of appendicitis. The risk of unnecessary appendicectomy was significantly (P = 0.03) lower after laparoscopy. The mean difference in duration of postoperative convalescence was 4.7 days in favour of of laparoscopic appendicectomy (P = 0.07), and 26 min in duration of operation in favour of conventional appendicectomy (P < 0.01). No differences were detected in postoperative hospital stay, pain assessment or complications.

Conclusion: The laparoscopic procedure is at least as good as conventional appendicectomy. Initial laparoscopy reduces the rate of misdiagnosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conventional appendicectomy
16
trial sequential
8
sequential design
8
laparoscopy conventional
8
duration postoperative
8
postoperative convalescence
8
appendicectomy
6
conventional
5
randomized controlled
4
controlled trial
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery is widely performed for acute appendicitis. We started conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in 1995 and introduced single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) in 2009. This study compared perioperative outcomes between SILA and CLA to evaluate the usefulness of SILA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Conventional anesthetic management of juvenile dermatomyositis involves general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation using non-depolarizing muscle relaxants. Neuromuscular monitoring would be required for the titration of neuromuscular blocking drugs as these patients are more sensitive to these drugs, which leads to delayed recovery. Here we present a 14-year-old girl with juvenile dermatomyositis posted for laparoscopic appendicectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Balancing a Surgical vs. Non-surgical Approach in Perforated Appendicitis.

Cureus

October 2024

General Surgery, Bay Pines Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, St. Petersburg, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Appendicitis is the inflammation of the appendix, often requiring emergency surgery, but complications like perforation can complicate treatment decisions.
  • The case study highlights a patient with perforated appendicitis treated conservatively with antibiotics and a drain, rather than immediate surgery.
  • Despite the trend toward non-surgical methods reducing immediate surgery risks, this case illustrates that complications can still prolong hospital stays.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Appendicectomy is a well-established surgical procedure to manage acute appendicitis. The operation was historically performed as an open procedure and is currently performed using minimally invasive surgical techniques. A recent development in appendicectomy technique is the introduction of single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Evidence about intra- and postoperative complication rates related to transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign gynecological conditions is still limited. We report and analyze data from a large cohort of patients operated in a single institution during 3.5 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!