Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The authors present the case of a left frontal solitary fibrous tumor of the meninges. The gross appearance of the tumor was very similar to that of a fibroblastic meningioma. Histological examination showed a mixture of spindle-shaped and round cells arranged in a collagen matrix. Immunohistochemical staining of the tumor demonstrated diffuse positive staining for CD34 and vimentin. The tumor displayed no positive staining for markers of muscle, epithelial, glial, or neurocrest differentiation or for estrogen and progesterone receptors. The MIB-1 labeling index (the percentage of positive staining tumor cell nuclei), a marker of cellular proliferation, was 1.1%. Ultrastructural studies support attributing a mesenchymal, rather than meningothelial, nature to the tumor. A differential diagnosis is discussed and a review of the literature on these rare tumors is presented.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.86.6.1049 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!