The authors compare their experience in dilatation of postoperative benign esophageal strictures. A total of 60 patients (37 males, 23 females: mean age 52), all with severe dysphagia, from January 1985 to September 1995, underwent endoscopic dilatation: 32 of these with Savary dilators and 28 with balloon dilators. Dilatation was effective in 93% in both groups. Two severe complications were recorded (1 heart attack and 1 perforation) in the group that underwent endoscopic dilatation with Savary dilators. During endoscopic management, pain recurred in 43% and 87% of cases after balloon or Savary dilatations, respectively. The authors believe balloon dilators are more effective, better tolerated and with less complications than Savary dilators. They reserve the management with Savary dilators to the extremely severe esophageal strictures.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

savary dilators
16
esophageal strictures
8
underwent endoscopic
8
endoscopic dilatation
8
dilatation savary
8
balloon dilators
8
dilators
6
savary
5
[the endoscopic
4
endoscopic treatment
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!