Objective: This study evaluated the biologic result of forces induced by a misfitting prosthetic superstructure on implants placed in a New Zealand white rabbit tibia model.
Study Design: Nine rabbits had two dental implants placed in both right and left proximal tibias. After 6 weeks, one animal was sacrificed for baseline integration data, and the remaining animals had fitting or misfitting prosthetic superstructures attached to the implants for 12 weeks. Implants were evaluated clinically, radiographically, and histomorphometrically at the scanning electron microscopic level.
Results: No clinical, radiographic, or histomorphometric evidence exists of integration failure with implants subjected to superstructure strain, although bone remodeling is noted.
Conclusions: Given the limitations of sample size, animal model used, duration of prosthetic superstructure attachment, and loading confounders possible, the study of prosthetic framework misfit must be evaluated with another animal model, such as an intraoral primate model, to determine the relationship between clinical performance and histologic findings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90006-8 | DOI Listing |
Biomedicines
November 2024
Dental Salon, Oral Surgery Academy, ul. E. Horbaczewskiego 53A, 54-130 Wrocław, Poland.
The following case report presents the treatment of a patient with severe maxillary atrophy and failing residual dentition. The patient has been diagnosed with stage IV grade C periodontitis, making this case challenging from the very beginning. The treatment plan was based on collecting and merging digital data: CBCT, a face scan, and an intraoral scan.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
August 2024
Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar, IND.
Introduction: The implant-supported prosthetic treatment strategy is commonly chosen in modern dentistry to address tooth loss caused by a variety of conditions or dental defects. To achieve healthy and natural-looking results in implant dentistry, it is essential to replicate the peri-implant soft tissue. The gingival tissue that surrounds implants is quite accurately replicated by gingival masks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Implant Dent
August 2024
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg/Lahn, Georg-Voigt Str. 3, 35039, Marburg, Lahn, Germany.
Purpose: The aim of this long-term cohort study in periodontally compromised patients with implants was to analyze the correlation between gingival phenotype and peri-implant crestal bone loss, and between clinical measures and gingival phenotype.
Methods: Implant-supported single crowns and bridges were used to rehabilitate 162 implants in 57 patients. Patients were examined over a 2 to 20-year period on a recall schedule of 3 to 6 months.
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent
April 2024
Private Practice, Messina (ME), Italy.
Rehabilitating thin jaws without reconstructive surgery entails using narrow implants. The proposed treatment adopted an innovative implant system, allowing the mini-screws to be parallel and immediately loaded. A mandible, wearing an overdenture, was functionalized contextually to the residual dental extraction and the placement of six 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!