Background: Determination of the immune status against measles in young adults requires careful evaluation of the laboratory methods because of waning immunity. The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) may lack the sensitivity required to detect very low levels of antibodies. In addition, the correlation between ELISA-IgG assays and the degree of protection from measles is not well defined.

Objectives: (a) Evaluation of a commonly used measles ELISA-IgG test kit in comparison with the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test which corresponds strongly to virus neutralization; (b) determination of false negative rates of the ELISA-IgG and the HI tests; (c) evaluation of the ELISA-IgG test kit as a quantitative assay.

Study Design: One hundred and eighty serum samples collected from 60 vaccinated young adults immediately before vaccination and 14 and 28 days postvaccination, were tested comparatively by HI and by a commercial ELISA-IgG kit. For evaluation of false negative rates, postvaccination sera of a cohort of 48 vaccinees with negative HI or ELISA-IgG prevaccination sera were tested for IgM. Sixty-three of the samples were also titrated by the ELISA-IgG kit using serial dilutions, for comparison with HI titers.

Results: Using the HI test as a reference method, the ELISA-IgG kit was found to have overall accuracy of 81%, sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 84%. The false negative and the false positive rates were 20% and 16%, respectively. In contrast, when we used postvaccination IgM test to distinguish between true and false prevaccination negatives in both the HI and ELISA-IgG tests, we found that the false negative rates were 75.6% by ELISA and 72.5% by HI, and false positive rates were 2.4% and 0%, respectively. Serum titers determined by the ELISA-IgG test were generally 5-10-fold higher than the corresponding HI titers, but without a consistent correlation.

Conclusions: Both the ELISA-IgG and the HI tests frequently failed to detect residual immunity. The two tests also did not correlate well with each other suggesting that different antigenic determinants of the virus are involved in each assay and therefore the HI test should not be used as a reference method for evaluation of the sensitivity of ELISA IgG kits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0928-0197(96)00240-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

false negative
16
young adults
12
hemagglutination inhibition
12
elisa-igg test
12
negative rates
12
elisa-igg tests
12
elisa-igg kit
12
elisa-igg
11
test
8
inhibition test
8

Similar Publications

Introduction Mucormycosis is an uncommon fungal infection caused by filamentous fungi of the Mucorales order, namely Rhizopus, Lichthemia, andMucor species. The incidence and prevalence of mucormycosis reached an all-time high during the COVID-19 pandemic due to excessive steroid use and other factors, leading to the coining of the term CAM (COVID Associated Mucormycosis). The diagnosis of mucormycosis is by a combination of histopathology and microbiological techniques, such as KOH mount and culture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) uses a cancer-targeted fluorescent agent injected into patients to localize tumor nodules. Pafolacianine is a folate receptor (FR)-targeted near-infrared fluorescent probe. Almost 10% of patients have false negative fluorescence findings intraoperatively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Enhancing the speed and efficiency of clinical trial recruitment is a key objective across international health systems. This study aimed to use artificial intelligence (AI) applied in the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR), a population-based cancer registry, to assess (1) if VCR received all relevant pathology reports for three clinical trials, (2) AI accuracy in auto-extracting information from pathology reports for recruitment, and (3) the number of participants approached for trial enrollment using the AI approach compared with standard hospital-based recruitment.

Methods: To verify pathology report accessibility for VCR trial enrollment, reports from the laboratory were cross-referenced.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a well-recognized cause of hip pain in adults. The hip-spine relationship between the femur, pelvis, and lumbosacral spine has garnered recent attention in hip arthroplasty. However, the hip-spine relationship has not been well described in patients with FAI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

False-Negative Review from the Mammography Audit: Refining Breast Imaging Practice.

Radiographics

February 2025

From the Washington University School of Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63110.

Annual review of false-negative (FN) mammograms is a mandatory and critical component of the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) annual mammography audit. FN review can help hone reading skills and improve the ability to detect cancers at mammography. Subtle architectural distortion, asymmetries (seen only on one view), small lesions, lesions with probably benign appearance (circumscribed regular borders), isolated microcalcifications, and skin thickening are the most common mammographic findings when the malignancy is visible at retrospective review of FN mammograms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!